Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Numerous epidemiological studies have provided compelling evidence linking baseline anaemia to unfavourable outcomes post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in both stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of anaemia on 12-month outcomes in individuals undergoing PCI for stable CAD or ACS, while also investigating anaemia's influence on clinical in-stent restenosis (ISR) following PCI. This retrospective single-centre observational cohort study involved 328 participants undergoing elective PCI, at a single centre. Participants were categorised into two groups: group 1 consisted of individuals with anaemia, while group 2 served as the non-anaemic control group. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin levels below 130 g/L in men and below 120 g/L in women. Follow-up assessments were conducted using retrospective clinic notes and linked data from the Office for National Statistics to evaluate the clinical impact of anaemia, post PCI. Cox regression was utilised to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and ISR in anaemic patients compared to non-anaemic individuals. We included all individuals aged 18 years and above diagnosed with de novo CAD eligible for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) employing drug-eluting stents (DES). Exclusions comprised individuals with chronic total occlusion lesions, left main CAD requiring primary PCI, end-stage renal disease, decompensated liver disease, or malignancy. In the cohort, 76 patients (23.2%) presented with anaemia, while 252 patients (76.8%) were non-anaemic. The mean age for anaemic patients was 49.43±9.52, compared to 50.23±9.67 for non-anaemic patients, with similar gender distributions observed in both groups. There were more diabetics in the anaemia group compared to the non-anaemic group (57 75.0% vs. 131 52.0%, P-value = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the incidence of unstable angina, stable angina, and NSTEMI between the two groups. Mean haemoglobin levels were markedly lower in the anaemic group compared to the non-anaemic group (9.25±1.49 g/dL vs. 14.34±0.65 g/dL, P-value Conflict of Interest NA
Saluja et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: