This study investigates the prevalence and underlying factors of examination malpractice at Nigerian University using a mixed-methods approach. It explores the extent of malpractice across faculties and academic levels, socio-economic drivers, and the academic and institutional consequences. Results reveal that examination malpractice remains a significant challenge, with a notable proportion of students reporting direct involvement or observation. Although, financial pressures and family expectations were not consistently cited as major contributors, the competitive job market emerged as a key factor motivating unethical practices. The study also highlights the detrimental effects of malpractice on students' academic performance, professional readiness, and the university's reputation. To address these issues, a multifaceted approach is recommended, including stricter enforcement of regulations, targeted awareness campaigns, enhanced student support services, and periodic policy reviews to strengthen academic integrity and institutional credibility.
A Fri, study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: