Females had ∼7 ms shorter R-wave peak times than males during LBB area pacing, suggesting sex-based cutoffs are needed to assess left bundle branch capture.
Do R-wave peak times used to identify left bundle branch capture during LBBAP differ between males and females?
222 patients (143 males, 79 females) undergoing left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP)
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP)
Comparison between males and females
R-wave peak times (RWPTs) on postimplant ECGs to identify left bundle branch capturesurrogate
R-wave peak times used to identify left bundle branch capture are shorter in females, suggesting the need for sex-specific cutoffs during LBBAP.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 0% vs 0%
Despite innate differences in QRS duration between males and females, no recommendations have been established to assess for left bundle branch (LBB) capture across different sexes in patients undergoing LBB area pacing (LBBAP). To this end, we performed a retrospective study analyzing postimplant ECGs from 222 patients (143 males/79 females). R-wave peak times (RWPTs), traditionally used to identify LBB capture, were noted to be ∼7 ms shorter in females vs. males, with the differences resolved when accounting for smaller size of female hearts despite no correlation between RWPT and body/heart size. These results argue towards establishing sex-based cutoffs for LBB capture.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ilya Y. Shadrin
Clinical Research Institute
Sara Coles
Duke University Hospital
Claus Graff
Aalborg University
Duke University Hospital
Aalborg University
Clinical Research Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shadrin et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Females had ∼7 ms shorter R-wave peak times than males during LBB area pacing, suggesting sex-based cutoffs are needed to assess left bundle branch capture.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d8caec16d51705d2ff54 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70181
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: