Inicio
Explorar
nav.journalClub
Tendencias
Más
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
Idioma
Español
Español
Dual-Mobility versus Fixed-Bearing Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Outcomes | Synapse
March 3, 2026
Ver artículo completo
Dual-Mobility versus Fixed-Bearing Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Outcomes
JR
Joshua P. Rainey
Mayo Clinic
LR
Logan E. Radtke
JG
Jeremy M. Gililland
Ver todo
Puntos clave
Dual-mobility constructs show improved stability compared to fixed-bearing constructs, reducing dislocation rates.
In 85% of cases, dual-mobility constructs led to lower revision rates compared to fixed-bearing constructs.
Systematic review of literature identified key differences in postoperative outcomes between both constructs.
Findings may indicate a need for careful consideration while selecting implant designs in surgeries.
Preguntar a la IA
Mark Helpful
Me gusta
Save
Guardar
Relay
Compartir
Ver artículo completo
Preguntar a la IA
Mark Helpful
Me gusta
Save
Guardar
Relay
Compartir
Ver artículo completo
Cite This Study
Copy
Rainey et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75ae8c6e9836116a215f9
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2026.01.062