ホーム
探索
nav.journalClub
トレンド
その他
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
言語
日本語
日本語
Dual-Mobility versus Fixed-Bearing Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Outcomes | Synapse
March 3, 2026
View Full Paper
Dual-Mobility versus Fixed-Bearing Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Outcomes
JR
Joshua P. Rainey
Mayo Clinic
LR
Logan E. Radtke
JG
Jeremy M. Gililland
See all
Key Points
Dual-mobility constructs show improved stability compared to fixed-bearing constructs, reducing dislocation rates.
In 85% of cases, dual-mobility constructs led to lower revision rates compared to fixed-bearing constructs.
Systematic review of literature identified key differences in postoperative outcomes between both constructs.
Findings may indicate a need for careful consideration while selecting implant designs in surgeries.
AIに質問
Mark Helpful
Like
Save
Bookmark
Relay
Share
View Full Paper
Cite This Study
Copy
Rainey et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75ae8c6e9836116a215f9
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2026.01.062
AIに質問
Mark Helpful
Like
Save
Bookmark
Relay
Share
View Full Paper