Glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composites were modified with carbon nanotubes (CNTs), Al2O3, and TiO2 nanoparticles to comparatively evaluate their influence on tensile, flexural, and low-velocity impact performance within an integrated experimental–numerical framework. Nanoparticles were incorporated at controlled weight fractions to identify dispersion-controlled reinforcement regimes and the onset of heterogeneity-driven mechanical transitions. Among all formulations, 0. 5 wt% CNTs provided the most pronounced static mechanical enhancement, increasing tensile strength to 419. 50 MPa (≈21% improvement over the reference GF laminate) and flexural strength to 230. 23 MPa (≈26% increase). In contrast, impact performance exhibited a non-monotonic evolution; the highest absorbed energy (9. 64 J) was observed at 2 wt% CNTs, indicating that dynamic energy dissipation mechanisms do not necessarily scale proportionally with static strength gains. Oxide-filled systems demonstrated stiffness-dominated behavior, where increasing filler content amplified elastic mismatch and progressively reduced strength despite modulus enhancement. Finite element simulations conducted in ANSYS LS-DYNA (MAT₀22) reproduced global stiffness trends within the dispersion-controlled regime. Tensile strength predictions agreed within 0–9% at optimal CNT loading, whereas larger deviations (up to ~33%) emerged under bending-dominated loading in oxide-rich systems, reflecting amplified sensitivity to microstructural heterogeneity. The coupled evolution of stiffness–strength decoupling (SSDI) and FEM deviation (η) enabled identification of a Composite Heterogeneity Threshold (CHT), defined as the nanoparticle concentration beyond which stiffness enhancement no longer translates into proportional strength or toughness improvement. Beyond this threshold, dispersion-induced heterogeneity not only reduces mechanical efficiency but also marks the boundary of homogenized continuum model adequacy across static and dynamic loading conditions.
Çetin et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: