Since 2000, the flipped classroom model has been widely adopted in higher education within the context of digital transformation; however, a comprehensive historical synthesis of review evidence remains limited. This study addresses this gap by conducting a review of reviews to clarify developmental trends, theoretical foundations, instructional designs, research methods, outcome variables, reported effects and implementation challenges, with the aim of informing sustainable education practices. Following the PRISMA framework, we systematically searched Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2000 and 2024. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and 25 systematic reviews met the eligibility requirements. Risk of bias and reporting quality were assessed descriptively at the review level. The results indicate generally positive perceptions among students and teachers, particularly regarding learning performance, collaboration and motivation, with the strongest evidence observed at the teaching and learning levels rather than at pedagogical or institutional levels. Substantial variation in flipped classroom designs and inconsistent reporting limited cross-study effect size synthesis. Further analysis reveals a fragmented theoretical basis and uneven attention to post-class learning processes. In response, two integrative frameworks—the Instructional Design Analysis Model for Flipped Classrooms (IDAMFC) and the Transformative Activation Theory for Flipped Classrooms (TAT-FC) are proposed to align pre-, in-, and post-class phases with learning strategies, cognitive engagement, and assessment in digitally supported environments. This study highlights the need for longitudinal designs and more comprehensive outcome measures to support sustainable educational development.
Yang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.