We present a tidal constituent catalog method for predicting the dynamics of hierarchical triple star systems. All significant frequencies are specified analytically from the known orbital periods — f (n, m) = n/Pᵢnner + m/Pₒuter — and only amplitudes and phases are fitted via linear least squares. On simulated Galilean moon separations, the catalog reduces prediction error from 18. 0% (blind FFT, 25 constituents) to 1. 3% (catalog order 4, 21 constituents), a 14× improvement. On real TESS photometry of six triply eclipsing triples with independent test epochs separated by 130–710 days from training data, all systems achieve < 2% NRMSE; TIC 14839347 shows 5× catalog superiority at 683-day extrapolation. The method is grounded in the shape sphere — the S² manifold on which the triangle formed by three bodies evolves (u² + v² + w² = 1 exactly). Fourier decomposition of the shape trajectory confirms that every oscillation matches a catalog frequency; no hidden modes exist. The dominant perturbation amplitude scales as A ∝ η⁰. 93 (R² = 0. 985) with virtual independence from mass ratios, enabling prediction tables without simulation. The equilibrium frequency ratio for three coupled oscillators satisfies the tribonacci equation r³ = r² + r + 1, yielding τ ≈ 1. 839. This ratio provides optimal KAM protection: systems at τ maintain their frequency ratio under all non-migratory perturbations tested, with shape band width 25× narrower than equivalent 2: 1 resonant systems. The framework generalises to N bodies through hierarchical decomposition into nested shape spheres, with the n-nacci equilibrium constant converging from τ = 1. 839 (n=3) toward 2. 000 (n→∞).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
C. R. (René) de Haan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
C. R. (René) de Haan (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e7143fcb99343efc98d96c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19646680
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: