Ecocide—the large-scale destruction of the environment—has gained increasing attention as a critical gap in the international legal framework. This article explores the evolution of ecocide from a moral and political concept into a potential fifth core international crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. While international treaties and mechanisms exist to regulate environmental harm, they lack provisions for criminal accountability of individuals or corporations responsible for severe and irreversible ecological damage. This study examines the historical context of ecocide, legal efforts to define and prosecute it, and the challenges of integrating it into international criminal law. Drawing on case studies such as Agent Orange, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, and various regional legal responses, the article highlights the limitations of current enforcement mechanisms. It also analyzes advocacy efforts by NGOs, legal scholars, and international organisations to criminalise ecocide and elevate environmental protection to the level of international justice. The recognition of ecocide as a core international crime would not only deter environmental destruction but also reinforce the connection between environmental protection, human rights, and sustainable development. The article argues that the inclusion of ecocide in the Rome Statute is a necessary step to ensure legal accountability for acts that threaten planetary health and human survival.
Oleksandra Tarasenko (Thu,) studied this question.