Asynchronous cardiomyoplasty with a conditioned muscle wrap improved ejection fraction compared to controls (34.0 vs 27.1, P=.008) and stabilized ventricular remodeling in a canine model.
RCT (n=20)
randomly selected
Does asynchronous cardiomyoplasty stabilize chronic remodeling in a canine model of dilated cardiomyopathy?
In a canine model of dilated cardiomyopathy, a conditioned muscle wrap alone (asynchronous cardiomyoplasty) stabilized the remodeling process and arrested progressive deterioration of systolic and diastolic function.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 34% vs 27.1%
valor p: p=.008
BACKGROUND: Dynamic cardiomyoplasty is a promising new therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy. The girdling effects of a conditioned muscle wrap alone have recently been postulated to partly explain its mechanism. We investigated this effect in a canine model of chronic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty dogs underwent rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) for 4 weeks to create a model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Seven dogs were then randomly selected to undergo subsequent cardiomyoplasty, and all dogs had 6 weeks of additional RVP. The cardiomyoplasty group also received 6 weeks of concurrent skeletal muscle stimulation consisting of single twitches delivered asynchronously at 2 Hz to transform the wrap without active assistance. All dogs were studied by pressure-volume analysis and echocardiography at baseline and after 4 and 10 weeks of pacing. Systolic indices, including ejection fraction (EF), end-systolic elastance (Ees), and preload-recruitable stroke work (PRSW) were all increased at 10 weeks in the wrap versus controls (EF, 34.0 versus 27.1, P=.008; Ees, 1.65 versus 1.26, P=.09; PRSW, 35.9 versus 25.5, P=.001). Ventricular volumes, diastolic relaxation, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures stabilized in the cardiomyoplasty group but continued to deteriorate in controls. Both the end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationships shifted farther rightward in controls but remained stable in the cardiomyoplasty group. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to potential benefits from active systolic assistance, benefits from dynamic cardiomyoplasty appear to be partially accounted for by the presence of a conditioned muscle wrap alone. This conditioned wrap stabilizes the remodeling process of heart failure, arresting progressive deterioration of systolic and diastolic function.
Patel et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=20). Cardiomyoplasty with concurrent skeletal muscle stimulation vs. Control (rapid ventricular pacing only) was evaluated on Ejection fraction at 10 weeks (p=.008). Asynchronous cardiomyoplasty with a conditioned muscle wrap improved ejection fraction compared to controls (34.0 vs 27.1, P=.008) and stabilized ventricular remodeling in a canine model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: