After mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation, 49% of patients had significant tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up, with incidence increasing to 74% at >3 years.
Cohort (n=70)
Does functional tricuspid regurgitation progress over time after successful mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation?
Close to 50% of patients develop significant tricuspid regurgitation after successful mitral valve repair for functional ischemic MR, with the incidence increasing over time and predicted by preoperative tricuspid annulus dilation.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 44% vs 67%
BACKGROUND: Despite correction of left-sided cardiac lesions, associated functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) that was surgically ignored can persist. It can also appear de novo. The aim of this study was to analyze TR in a group of patients who underwent successful revascularization and mitral valve repair (MVRep) for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 124 consecutive patients with MVRep, 70 left the operating room with MR 3 years. Absence or presence of recurrent MR did not significantly affect TR (14 of 22 64% with MR versus 20 of 48 42% with no MR). Preoperative and postoperative tricuspid annulus size in patients with late TR was significantly larger than in patients without TR. CONCLUSIONS: Functional TR is frequently associated with functional ischemic MR. After MVRep, close to 50% of patients have TR. The incidence of postoperative TR increases with time. Preoperative tricuspid annulus dilation might be a predictor of late TR.
Matsunaga et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Functional ischemic mitral regurgitation (n=70). Tricuspid valve repair vs. Surgically ignored tricuspid valve was evaluated on Residual tricuspid regurgitation. After mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation, 49% of patients had significant tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up, with incidence increasing to 74% at >3 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: