PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 6, 2017Stroke132 citationsOpen Access

P-Wave Indices and Risk of Ischemic Stroke

View Full Paper
JHJinli HeGTGary TsePKPanagiotis Korantzopoulos

Key Result

P-wave terminal force in lead V1 independently predicted ischemic stroke risk per 1 SD change (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.12-1.25; P<0.0001), as did P-wave duration and maximum P-wave area.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis

Structured PICO

Do electrocardiographic P-wave indices predict the risk of incident ischemic stroke?

P
Population
Patients from 10 studies evaluating the association between P-wave indices and stroke risk
I
Intervention
Electrocardiographic P-wave indices (P-wave terminal force in lead V1, P-wave duration, and maximum P-wave area)
O
Outcome
Incident ischemic strokehard clinical

Electrocardiographic P-wave indices, including terminal force in lead V1, duration, and maximum area, are significant predictors of incident ischemic stroke risk.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.25)

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Atrial cardiomyopathy is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 , P-wave duration, and maximum P-wave area are electrocardiographic parameters that have been used to assess left atrial abnormalities related to developing atrial fibrillation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine their values for predicting ischemic stroke risk. Methods— PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched until December 2016 for studies that evaluated the association between P-wave indices and stroke risk. Both fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate the overall effect estimates. Results— Ten studies examining P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 , P-wave duration, and maximum P-wave area were included. P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 was found to be an independent predictor of stroke as both a continuous variable (odds ratio OR per 1 SD change, 1.18; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.12–1.25; P <0.0001) and categorical variable (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.10–2.28; P =0.01). P-wave duration was a significant predictor of incident ischemic stroke when analyzed as a categorical variable (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.37–2.52; P <0.0001) but not when analyzed as a continuous variable (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98–1.13; P =0.15). Maximum P-wave area also predicted the risk of incident ischemic stroke (OR per 1 SD change, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04–1.17). Conclusions— P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 , P-wave duration, and maximum P-wave area are useful electrocardiographic markers that can be used to stratify the risk of incident ischemic stroke.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

He et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Ischemic stroke. P-wave indices was evaluated on Incident ischemic stroke (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.25, p=<0.0001). P-wave terminal force in lead V1 independently predicted ischemic stroke risk per 1 SD change (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.12-1.25; P<0.0001), as did P-wave duration and maximum P-wave area.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f2f3e1cf410a932427671https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.117.017293
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper