Key result
P-wave terminal force in lead V1 linked to ~18% greater ischemic stroke risk per SD.
Why the study?
Do electrocardiographic P-wave indices predict the risk of incident ischemic stroke?
Meta-Analysis
Do electrocardiographic P-wave indices predict the risk of incident ischemic stroke?
Electrocardiographic P-wave indices, including terminal force in lead V1, duration, and maximum area, are significant predictors of incident ischemic stroke risk.
May aid ECG-based stroke risk assessment; confirms pooled association but requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background and Purpose— Atrial cardiomyopathy is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 , P-wave duration, and maximum P-wave area are electrocardiographic parameters that have been used to assess left atrial abnormalities related to developing atrial fibrillation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine their values for predicting ischemic stroke risk. Methods— PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched until December 2016 for studies that evaluated the association between P-wave indices and stroke risk. Both fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate the overall effect estimates. Results— Ten studies examining P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 , P-wave duration, and maximum P-wave area were included. P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 was found to be an independent predictor of stroke as both a continuous variable (odds ratio [OR] per 1 SD change, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.25; P <0.0001) and categorical variable (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.10–2.28; P =0.01). P-wave duration was a significant predictor of incident ischemic stroke when analyzed as a categorical variable (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.37–2.52; P <0.0001) but not when analyzed as a continuous variable (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98–1.13; P =0.15). Maximum P-wave area also predicted the risk of incident ischemic stroke (OR per 1 SD change, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04–1.17). Conclusions— P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 , P-wave duration, and maximum P-wave area are useful electrocardiographic markers that can be used to stratify the risk of incident ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Ischemic stroke. P-wave indices was evaluated on Incident ischemic stroke (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.25, p=<0.0001). P-wave terminal force in lead V1 independently predicted ischemic stroke risk per 1 SD change (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.12-1.25; P<0.0001), as did P-wave duration and maximum P-wave area.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: