Radiofrequency ablation achieved AAD-free AF elimination at 1 year in 75% of patients with isolated diastolic dysfunction vs 84% of controls, with a higher recurrence risk (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.7).
Cohort (n=368)
Does radiofrequency ablation improve AAD-free AF elimination in patients with AAD-refractory AF and LV systolic or isolated diastolic dysfunction compared to those with normal LV function?
Radiofrequency ablation for AAD-refractory AF is less effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with systolic or diastolic dysfunction compared to those with normal LV function, though it still provides functional benefits.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 75% vs 84%
valor p: p=0.007
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and isolated diastolic dysfunction is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort of patients with normal and abnormal LV function underwent ablation for antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory AF. Three groups were compared: 111 patients with systolic dysfunction, defined as LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%; 157 patients with isolated diastolic dysfunction but preserved LVEF ≥50%; and 100 patients with normal LV function. The primary end point was AAD-free AF elimination at 1 year after ablation. This end point was achieved in 62% of patients with systolic dysfunction, 75% of those with diastolic dysfunction, and 84% of controls (P=0.007). AF control on or off AADs was achieved in 76% of patients with systolic dysfunction, 85% of those with diastolic dysfunction, and 89% of controls (P=0.08). In the systolic dysfunction group, 49% experienced an increase in LVEF by ≥5% after ablation, of which 64% achieved normal LVEF. In the diastolic dysfunction group, 30% of patients demonstrated at least 1 grade improvement in diastolic dysfunction. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an increased relative risk of arrhythmia recurrence of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1 to 3.1; P=0.02) in systolic dysfunction and 1.7 (1.0 to 2.7; P=0.04) in isolated diastolic dysfunction compared with normal function. CONCLUSIONS: Although an ablative approach for AF in patients with systolic or diastolic dysfunction is associated with an increased long-term recurrence risk, there is potential for substantial quality-of-life improvement and LV functional benefit.
Cha et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Antiarrhythmic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (n=368). Radiofrequency ablation vs. Normal LV function was evaluated on AAD-free AF elimination at 1 year after ablation (p=0.007). Radiofrequency ablation achieved AAD-free AF elimination at 1 year in 75% of patients with isolated diastolic dysfunction vs 84% of controls, with a higher recurrence risk (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.7).