Key result
Radiofrequency ablation achieved AAD-free AF elimination at 1 year in 75% of patients with isolated diastolic dysfunction vs 84% of controls, with a higher recurrence risk (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.7).
Why the study?
Does radiofrequency ablation improve AAD-free AF elimination in patients with AAD-refractory AF and LV systolic or isolated diastolic dysfunction compared to those with normal LV function?
Population
n=368 patients with antiarrhythmic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation undergoing ablation, comprising 111…
Comparison
Radiofrequency ablation vs Normal LV function group
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
1 year
Authors
Loading...
May warrant closer monitoring after ablation in isolated diastolic dysfunction; leaves open randomized confirmation of efficacy.
Cohort (n=368)
Does radiofrequency ablation improve AAD-free AF elimination in patients with AAD-refractory AF and LV systolic or isolated diastolic dysfunction compared to those with normal LV function?
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 84%
p-value: p=0.007
Radiofrequency ablation for AAD-refractory AF is less effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with systolic or diastolic dysfunction compared to those with normal LV function, though it still provides functional benefits.
Cha et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Antiarrhythmic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (n=368). Radiofrequency ablation vs. Normal LV function was evaluated on AAD-free AF elimination at 1 year after ablation (p=0.007). Radiofrequency ablation achieved AAD-free AF elimination at 1 year in 75% of patients with isolated diastolic dysfunction vs 84% of controls, with a higher recurrence risk (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: