Key result
Catheter ablation yielded a significantly higher 12-month sinus rhythm maintenance rate (68.42%) compared to direct current cardioversion (35%) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
Why the study?
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation improve 12-month sinus rhythm maintenance and cardiac function compared to direct current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Cohort (n=97)
No
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation improve 12-month sinus rhythm maintenance and cardiac function compared to direct current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Absolute Event Rate: 68.42% vs 35%
p-value: p=0.001
In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, catheter ablation significantly improves 12-month sinus rhythm maintenance and cardiac function compared to direct current cardioversion.
Ablation was associated with higher sinus rhythm maintenance in this cohort; leaves open whether it outperforms cardioversion in persistent AF with HF.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of catheter ablation vs. direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and to define baseline features of patients that will get more benefit from ablation. METHODS: From July 2013 to October 2014, 97 consecutive single-center patients with persistent AF and symptomatic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%) underwent DCC followed by amiodarone (n = 40) or circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; n = 57) according to patient's preference were recruited in the study. Post-ablation recurrence was treated with atrial roof and mitral isthmus lines ablation with or without PVI based on restoration or not of pulmonary vein (PV) potential conduction. Study outcomes were 12-month rate of sustained sinus rhythm (SR) and cardiac function. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with and without cardiac function improvement post ablation. RESULTS: With similarly distributed characteristics at baseline, ablation (mean 1.8 procedures) relative to DCC yielded significantly higher level of 12-month SR maintenance rate (68.42% vs. 35%, P = 0.001); and better LVEF and New York Heart Association class. with significant effect for DCC only in maintained SR cases. Post ablation LVEF increased (>20% or to over 55%) in 31 (54.39%) patients with worse baseline cardiac function and ventricular rate control. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation relative to cardioversion of persistent AF with symptomatic heart failure yielded better 12-month SR maintenance and cardiac function. Compared with non-responders, patients with improved LVEF post-ablation had poorer ventricular rate control and cardiac function at baseline, suggesting a significant component of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in this group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=97). Radiofrequency catheter ablation vs. Direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) followed by amiodarone was evaluated on 12-month rate of sustained sinus rhythm (SR) (p=0.001). Catheter ablation yielded a significantly higher 12-month sinus rhythm maintenance rate (68.42%) compared to direct current cardioversion (35%) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: