Key result
ASA IV+ status linked to ~4.7-fold higher odds of postoperative adverse events vs. ASA III.
Why the study?
Perioperative EHR datasets are increasingly used to study postoperative morbidity, but database-recorded adverse-event indicators may not correspond to standardized complication endpoints, motivating characterization of their associations with routinely available perioperative variables.
Are routinely available perioperative variables (such as ASA physical status and procedure group) associated with EHR-captured postoperative adverse-event indicators in adults undergoing abdominal surgery?
Cohort (n=5,679)
No
Are routinely available perioperative variables (such as ASA physical status and procedure group) associated with EHR-captured postoperative adverse-event indicators in adults undergoing abdominal surgery?
Clinician-assigned ASA physical status (specifically ASA IV+) and laparotomy/adhesiolysis procedures were independently associated with higher odds of EHR-captured postoperative adverse-event indicators after adult abdominal surgery, though these operational database indicators do not represent standardized 30-day complication risks.
May inform targeted monitoring for ASA IV+ abdominal surgery patients; extends ASA associations to EHR-captured events but leaves incremental value open.
Background Perioperative electronic health record (EHR) datasets are increasingly used to study postoperative morbidity, although database-recorded adverse-event indicators may not correspond to standardized complication endpoints. We characterized these indicators after adult abdominal surgery in MOVER EPIC and examined associations with routinely available perioperative variables. Methods This retrospective cohort study identified adult abdominal surgical encounters from 2017–2022 through procedure-name screening and case-level deduplication. The primary outcome was a broad composite of EHR-captured postoperative adverse-event indicators recorded within the indexed perioperative encounter. The secondary outcome was a narrower composite of severe EHR-captured adverse-event indicators. Multivariable logistic regression was performed in the primary complete-case cohort, adjusting for age, sex group, ASA physical status, procedure group, and operating-room duration. Sensitivity analyses included ASA-excluded models, alternative duration specifications, first-encounter restriction, penalized regression, patient-level cluster-robust inference, and inverse probability weighting (IPW). Results Among 5,679 encounters, the broad composite occurred in 166 (2.92%), the narrow severe composite in 95 (1.67%), and death in 23 (0.40%). In the primary complete-case cohort (n = 5,349; 147 broad events), ASA IV + was strongly associated with the broad composite compared with ASA III (adjusted OR 4.66, 95% CI 2.92–7.45; p < 0.001). Laparotomy/adhesiolysis was also associated with higher odds (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.02–3.13; p = 0.041), whereas spline analyses suggested modest nonlinearity in the age association; operating-room duration was not independently associated. IPW estimates were materially similar, although the estimate for ASA I–II was less precise. Conclusions Clinician-assigned ASA physical status was the most consistent correlate of EHR-captured postoperative adverse-event indicators. ASA may reflect comorbidity burden and perceived perioperative vulnerability rather than directly measuring physiological reserve. These findings should not be interpreted as standardized 30-day postoperative complication risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Adult abdominal surgery (n=5,679). ASA physical status IV+ (and other routinely available perioperative variables: age, sex, procedure group, operating-room duration) vs. ASA physical status III was evaluated on Broad composite of EHR-captured postoperative adverse-event indicators (cardiovascular, respiratory, airway, neurological, metabolic, injury or infection, and death-related events) within the indexed perioperative encounter (OR 4.66, 95% CI 2.92-7.45, p=<0.001). ASA IV+ physical status was strongly associated with higher odds of the broad EHR-captured postoperative adverse-event composite compared with ASA III (adjusted OR 4.66, 95% CI 2.92–7.45; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: