Why the study?
Does an in-home telehealth communication device (Health Buddy) improve self-efficacy, functional status, depression, and health-related quality of life compared to traditional home management strategies in heart failure patients?
Population
Heart failure patients (n=90 completed)
Comparison
In-home telehealth communication device for… vs Traditional home management strategies
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
2 months
Key result
Delivering heart failure management via the Health Buddy telehealth device was feasible and as effective as traditional methods over 2 months, though 30% of participants withdrew due to device issues.
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change practice due to withdrawals; leaves open telehealth efficacy for HF in randomized trials.
Does an in-home telehealth communication device (Health Buddy) improve self-efficacy, functional status, depression, and health-related quality of life compared to traditional home management strategies in heart failure patients?
Delivering a heart failure disease management program through a telehealth communication device is feasible and may be as effective as traditional methods for patient-reported outcomes.
LaFramboise et al. (2003) studied Heart failure (n=90). Health Buddy (in-home telehealth communication device) vs. Traditional home management strategies (telephonic, home visit) was evaluated on Feasibility, self-efficacy, functional status, depression, and health-related quality of life. Delivering heart failure management via the Health Buddy telehealth device was feasible and as effective as traditional methods over 2 months, though 30% of participants withdrew due to device issues.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: