Unenhanced CT attenuation correlated with MRI proton density fat fraction (= 0.554), allowing for the quantification of liver fat content in clinical practice.
Observational (n=221)
Does unenhanced MDCT accurately estimate liver fat content compared to MRI-derived proton density fat fraction?
Unenhanced CT attenuation correlates linearly with MRI PDFF, allowing for the quantification of liver fat content in clinical practice, though factors like iron overload and variable tube voltage can affect accuracy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relation between unenhanced CT liver attenuation values and MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) for estimation of liver fat content at CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CT-MRI phantom was constructed and imaged containing 12 vials with lipid fractions ranging from 0% to 100%. For the retrospective clinical arm, 221 patients (120 men, 101 women; mean age, 54 years) underwent both unenhanced CT and chemical shift-encoded MRI of the liver between 2007 and 2017. Among these patients, 92 had more than one 120-kV CT scan for comparison. CT attenuation and MRI PDFF were derived with coregistered ROI measurements in the right hepatic lobe. The 120-kV subgroup of CT examinations performed within 1 month of MRI PDFF examinations (n = 72) served as the primary cohort for linear correlation. The effects of different tube voltage settings, time intervals between CT and MRI, and iron overload were assessed. Linear least squares regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: = 0.554). For patients with multiple scans, correlation progressively worsened over time. CT-based liver fat content was underestimated in several patients with iron overload. CONCLUSION: The linear correlation between unenhanced CT attenuation and MRI PDFF allows quantification of liver fat content by means of unenhanced CT in clinical practice. As expected, correlation worsened with increasing CT-MRI time interval, variable tube voltage settings, and iron overload.
Pickhardt et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Liver fat content (n=221). Unenhanced MDCT vs. MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was evaluated on Linear correlation between unenhanced CT liver attenuation values and MRI-derived PDFF. Unenhanced CT attenuation correlated with MRI proton density fat fraction (= 0.554), allowing for the quantification of liver fat content in clinical practice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: