Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
BACKGROUND: Lecturing (didactic) has been the key teaching-learning method for a long time. As per competency-based medical education, an Indian medical graduate should be competent in recommended skills. In the subject of Community Medicine of medical undergraduation, "Biostatistics" is one of the components of the curriculum. Often the students find the statistics challenging to understand and thus neglect it or prefer rote learning. In the recent era, many newer teaching-learning modalities have come up, namely problem-based learning (PBL), small group teaching, community-based learning, etc. The objective was to compare the utility and effectiveness of PBL versus traditional teaching techniques (didactic) for Biostatistics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in the department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Azamgarh (Uttar Pradesh) from March to November 2019. A total of 96 medical students of the final year were randomly divided into two groups. 'Group A' underwent didactic lecturing whereas "Group B" had problem-based learning for identified topics in Biostatistics. The teaching material and instructors were the same for both groups. Two weeks after completion of sessions, students' assessment was carried out for both groups. RESULTS: < 0.05) was observed between the mean examination score of Group A (traditional teaching technique) and Group B (PBL). Group B had higher scores than group A in all assessment heads (Objective, Descriptive, and Viva-voce). PBL was perceived to be a student-centric Teaching-learning method promoting analytical skills, critical thinking & overall self-directed learning. CONCLUSION: in comparison to didactic lecturing.
Bihari et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: