The LightFD classifier achieved better classification performance and decision efficiency for EEG driver mental states identification compared to traditional classifiers like SVM, CNN, GRU, and LMNN.
Driver fatigue
LightFD classifier vs Traditional classifiers (SVM, CNN, GRU, LMNN)
Classification performance and decision efficiency
Fatigue driving can easily lead to road traffic accidents and bring great harm to individuals and families. Recently, electroencephalography- (EEG-) based physiological and brain activities for fatigue detection have been increasingly investigated. However, how to find an effective method or model to timely and efficiently detect the mental states of drivers still remains a challenge. In this paper, we combine common spatial pattern (CSP) and propose a light-weighted classifier, LightFD, which is based on gradient boosting framework for EEG mental states identification. The comparable results with traditional classifiers, such as support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural network (CNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and large margin nearest neighbor (LMNN), show that the proposed model could achieve better classification performance, as well as the decision efficiency. Furthermore, we also test and validate that LightFD has better transfer learning performance in EEG classification of driver mental states. In summary, our proposed LightFD classifier has better performance in real-time EEG mental state prediction, and it is expected to have broad application prospects in practical brain-computer interaction (BCI).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hong Zeng
Beijing Technology and Business University
Yang Chen
University of Michigan
Hua Zhang
Jinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Sapienza University of Rome
Hangzhou Dianzi University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zeng et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Driver fatigue. LightFD classifier vs. Traditional classifiers (SVM, CNN, GRU, LMNN) was evaluated on Classification performance and decision efficiency. The LightFD classifier achieved better classification performance and decision efficiency for EEG driver mental states identification compared to traditional classifiers like SVM, CNN, GRU, and LMNN.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a191fb9ff42a97fac57e0db — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3761203
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: