Cangrelor administered shortly before reperfusion reduced infarction from 38% of the ischemic zone in control hearts to 19% in a rabbit model of ischemia/reperfusion.
Do P2Y12 blockers like cangrelor and clopidogrel reduce infarction size in a rabbit model of ischemia/reperfusion?
P2Y12 inhibitors cangrelor and clopidogrel protect rabbit hearts against infarction via signal transduction during reperfusion, mimicking ischemic postconditioning.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 19% vs 38%
BACKGROUND: Blockade of platelet activation during primary percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction is standard care to minimize stent thrombosis. To determine whether antiplatelet agents offer any direct cardioprotective effect, we tested whether they could modify infarction in a rabbit model of ischemia/reperfusion caused by reversible ligation of a coronary artery. METHODS AND RESULTS: The P2Y₁₂ (adenosine diphosphate) receptor blocker cangrelor administered shortly before reperfusion in rabbits undergoing 30-minute regional ischemia/3-hour reperfusion reduced infarction from 38% of ischemic zone in control hearts to only 19%. Protection was dose dependent and correlated with the degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation. Protection was comparable to that seen with ischemic postconditioning (IPOC). Cangrelor protection, but not its inhibition of platelet aggregation, was abolished by the same signaling inhibitors that block protection from IPOC suggesting protection resulted from protective signaling rather than anticoagulation. As with IPOC, protection was lost when cangrelor administration was delayed until 10 minutes after reperfusion and no added protection was seen when cangrelor and IPOC were combined. These findings suggest both IPOC and cangrelor may protect by the same mechanism. No protection was seen when cangrelor was used in crystalloid-perfused isolated hearts indicating some component in whole blood is required for protection. Clopidogrel had a very slow onset of action requiring 2 days of treatment before platelets were inhibited, and only then the hearts were protected. Signaling inhibitors given just prior to reperfusion blocked clopidogrel's protection. Neither aspirin nor heparin was protective. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel and cangrelor protected rabbit hearts against infarction. The mechanism appears to involve signal transduction during reperfusion rather than inhibition of intravascular coagulation. We hypothesize that both drugs protect by activating IPOC's protective signaling to prevent reperfusion injury. If true, patients receiving P2Y₁₂ inhibitors before percutaneous intervention may already be postconditioned thus explaining failure of recent clinical trials of postconditioning drugs.
Yang et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Ischemia/reperfusion injury (myocardial infarction). Cangrelor and Clopidogrel vs. Control was evaluated on Infarction size (% of ischemic zone). Cangrelor administered shortly before reperfusion reduced infarction from 38% of the ischemic zone in control hearts to 19% in a rabbit model of ischemia/reperfusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: