Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This article argues that an interposed company may be under a contractual obligation to pass on income to a resident of a third state. Such a company would still possess dominion over the income. However, the absence of such an obligation is inconclusive for determining whether an interposed company is a conduit.
Jain et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: