This article argues that an interposed company may be under a contractual obligation to pass on income to a resident of a third state. Such a company would still possess dominion over the income. However, the absence of such an obligation is inconclusive for determining whether an interposed company is a conduit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: