Nutritional care is consistently overlooked in oncology practice. It is a critical factor everyone acknowledges, but few actively address, leaving patients neglected. This article explores the challenges of ensuring optimal nutritional care in oncology. Significant disparities have been identified among key cancer nutrition guidelines issued by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO). While some emphasise comprehensive nutritional assessments, others focus on pharmacological interventions. Although aligning guideline recommendations with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria can be complex, there are shared principles that support effective identification and management of malnutrition and cachexia in clinical settings. The key barriers that oncology health professionals face are also highlighted as these are likely to impeded good nutritional care. There is a need for a standardised, pragmatic approach in assessment and management of nutrition in patients with cancer. This will facilitate the integration of nutrition into cancer care and help overcome barriers. Emerging digital solutions may serve as a conduit to improve nutritional cancer care and enhance communication between patients and healthcare providers and streamline evidence-based nutritional care in oncology.
Hustad et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: