Researchers in psychology traditionally use analysis of variance to examine differences between multiple groups or conditions. A less well-known, but valuable alternative is contrast analysis — a simple statistical method to test directional, theoretically motivated hypotheses that were defined prior to data collection. In this article, we review the core concepts of contrast analysis for testing hypotheses in between-subjects and within-subjects designs. We also outline and demonstrate the largely unknown possibility to directly test two competing contrasts against each other. In the tutorial part of the article, we show how such competing-contrast analyses can be conducted in the free, open-source software R using the package cofad . Because competing-contrast analysis is a straightforward, flexible, highly powered, and hypothesis-driven approach, it is a valuable tool to extend the understanding of cognitive and behavioral processes in psychological research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mirka Henninger
Technische Hochschule Mannheim
Simone Malejka
Technische Hochschule Mannheim
Johannes Titz
Chemnitz University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Henninger et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0fa0e6551bb0af8d17d0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kfg79_v3
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: