The study aimed to demonstrate the effects of arbitration on the parties to the arbitration and the arbitration panel according to the Jordanian Arbitration Law No. 31 of 2001. According to the intended purpose of this study to follow the researcher's methodology yes Induction and analysis of the subject of study, where the researcher concluded that the Jordanian legislator did not address the delivery of a copy of the ruling to the parties to the dispute, which may it causes the loss of the rights of the parties to the dispute in the event of a desire to exercise these rights. The study showed that the arbitration panel may not exploit the submission of a request to correct or interpret the arbitration award to review the dispute again, and the study explained that it is not permissible to refer the dispute again to the judiciary or the arbitration panel because the decision of the arbitrator has acquired the force of res judicata. The Jordanian legislator did not address the issue of whether the authority is considered part of public order, because the basic principle of things is permissibility. Thus, it is possible to say that the authority is not considered a matter of public order, the study explained that the Jordanian arbitration law must stipulate the exhaustion of the arbitration panel’s mandate due to its importance.
Al-Sharman et al. (Fri,) studied this question.