Abstract Benefits in patient comfort, efficiency, and sustainability can come from reducing positron emission tomography (PET) scan’s acquisition duration. This study assesses the clinical adequacy of restoring fast-acquisition 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 FFDG) PET to its standard-of-care image quality through deep-learning-based (DL) methods. Fast and standard whole-body 18 FFDG PET acquisitions of 117 oncological patients were included in the training and testing of three convolutional neural networks. The best-performing network during training was chosen for clinical evaluation on the test set ( N = 25). Visual assessment and lesion detectability of the fast acquisitions, of 20 and 30 seconds per axial field of view (s/AFOV), with and without DL-based denoising, and of the local standard of care, of 70 s/AFOV, were performed by three experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Quantification was conducted globally (voxel-wise), in healthy organs and the reported lesions. Optimised Gaussian and non-local means filters served as benchmarks. Visual assessment revealed 20 and 30 s/AFOV with DL-based denoising to have similar image quality to the standard of care. Average lesion-based sensitivity and positive predictive value were 74% and 72%, respectively, for 20 s/AFOV + DL and 72% and 80% for 30 s/AFOV + DL. DL-based denoising displayed the highest voxel-wise agreement with the standard-of-care ( p < 0.001). Liver and lungs in the DL-denoised images exhibited a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the standard of care. The median absolute maximum standardised uptake value deviation in the lesions was as low as 0.39 for 20 s/AFOV + DL and 0.30 for 30 s/AFOV + DL. The proposed DL-based method proved to be suitable for the restoration of fast-acquisition whole-body 18 FFDG PET, having resulted in images similar to the standard-of-care acquisitions. DL-based denoising outperformed standard benchmark methods.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Silva et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3ef02b87ece8dc9574bb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01638-9
Luísa Carvalho Silva
Champalimaud Foundation
Cláudia S. Constantino
Champalimaud Foundation
Ricardo Teixeira
Champalimaud Foundation
Champalimaud Foundation
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: