An analysis of Samuel Beckett’s play’s absurd elements the current paper pertains to Waiting for Godot. The artistic qualities of this work, including its title, setting, structure, themes, characters, and actions/dialogues, are analyzed via an absurdist lens. Throughout the play, absurdity is depicted in the form of a life devoid of purpose and meaning, characterized by chaos, a passion for death, and emotional and spiritual barrenness. A concept in the philosophy of absurdism holds that the universe is wholly illogical and meaningless and that the individual’s quest for order leads to a confrontation with the universe itself. Among the most prominent examples of absurd literature is Waiting for Godot, where the people are unrecognizable, the scene is remote, and the conversation makes no common sense. Once Martin Esslin’s book ‘The Theatre of Absurd’ was published in 1961, the phrase ‘Absurd Drama’ or ‘Theatre of Absurd’ became a common expression. In the opinion of Albert Camus, a French philosopher, life is lived solely to exist in a world that is no further comprehensible due to the absence of a transcendent being capable of reconciling its incoherence. This concept is exemplified by “Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot,” which Camus characterized as “Absurd.” With an emphasis on “Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot,” we have attempted to comprehend the basic idea of ‘Absurdism’ in this paper. The conflict in the meanings of life and the struggles of the characters in the present paper is reflected in the inclusion of absurd elements including meaningless dialogues, repetition, desolation, dark humor, fantasy, indefinite time, a lack of a well-crafted plot, puppet-like characters, and a violation of tradition. This paper demonstrates the agony of human beings, their tedium with life, the futility of life, and the conflicts between body and mind, thereby making it impossible to identify which is right and wrong.
Gajanand Sharma (Tue,) studied this question.