Abstract: Background: Global statistics recorded that there were 1,116 welding accidents, of which 19.8% ended in death. Welding workers in Bandung Raya often have accidents that result in lost working days. Therefore, it is necessary to take risk control efforts based on the identification and risk assessment of workers. Material and Methods: This study uses a descriptive observational research design. The study was conducted by field observation to 15 welding kiosks, the results of which were summarized. The risk assessment method uses JSA with risk assessment steps that refer to the welding work steps. Results: Based on the results of the study, it can be seen that the stages of the welding process for informal sector workers are, preparing materials, cutting iron, welding processes, and finishing. The results of the hazard identification identified three hazards, namely physical, chemical, and ergonomic. The results of the initial risk assessment show that there are 2 extreme risks, 7 high risks, and 5 moderate risks. While the remaining risk is 8 high risk, 1 moderate risk, and 5 low risk. Recommended efforts include using safety googles, face shields, safety shoes, safety gloves, providing light fire extinguishers, and providing seats.
Suherdin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: