The transformation of the legislative electoral system in Indonesia reflects the significant changes from the New Order to the Reformation Era, emphasising the adaptation to national political dynamics and democratic principles. This study examines how the legislative electoral systems during these periods compare within Indonesia's constitutional law context. The research adopts a normative juridical approach with statutory, comparative, and historical methods, analysing primary and secondary legal materials. The discussion reveals that the New Order era was characterized by a centralized system with limited political freedom, whereas the Reformation era introduced more inclusive and representative electoral laws. The main findings highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each system in realizing democratic principles and popular sovereignty. This comparative analysis contributes to understanding Indonesia's electoral systems' evolution and ongoing efforts to enhance democratic governance.
Sistyawan et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: