Advances in genetic engineering have enabled science to intervene in the natural processes of human conception, development, and the formation of personal identity. These developments are driving fundamental shifts in legal anthropology, particularly in the understanding of human life as an absolute legal value. The application of traditional constitutional and legal norms that enshrine the first (classical) generations of human rights to relationships involving convergent technologies is often inadequate and fraught with contradictions. For instance, the emergence of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has brought to the forefront the issue of defining the legal personality of so-called «designer babies». This technology allows geneticists to edit parts of the human germline genome by deleting, adding, or altering DNA sequences. However, parental «customization» of a child’s somatic traits raises concerns about fulfilling parental demands that may carry potential harm of various kinds to the child and their personal identity. The authors advocate for an approach where the overarching principle in protecting the legal personality of children born via reproductive technologies should be the recognition of their status as the vulnerable party in legal relations complicated by genetic engineering. The study highlights, within legal anthropological methodology, both the interconnection and the distinction between the subject-level and personhood-level dimensions of human presence in law. Attempts to modify human nature and influence the personhood-level of existence underscore the urgent need for foundational cultural, bioethical, and normative frameworks to ensure adequate and effective legal regulation.
Павлов et al. (Sun,) studied this question.