Transcendent experiences such as mystical, near-death, and Kundalini overlap in their phenomenology and aftereffects. Current theories and psychometric scales offer little explanation for the overlap. This study psychometrically tests an explanatory framework hypothesizing a common mechanism underlying transcendent experiences, including a peak experience called higher consciousness. A scale measuring higher consciousness is developed, validated, and used to identify related experiences. A global online survey of transcendent experiences and their effects was administered (n = 630). Factor analysis, essential unidimensionality assessments, and cross-validation were used to examine the common variance of transcendent experiences, and to develop a scale measuring higher consciousness. Regularized Multiple Indicators, Multiple Causes (MIMIC) was used to identify experiences related to higher consciousness. Cluster analysis and decision trees were used for subject-wise classification. A broad range of transcendent experiences loaded strongly onto a single latent construct. The higher consciousness scale demonstrated good consistency, generalizability, and validity. Scale factors included unity-consciousness, bliss, insight, somatic energy sensations, and luminosity. A predictive model accurately classified high-intensity higher consciousness experiencers. Psychological and physical statistical predictors of higher consciousness were identified, including experiences of selflessness. A novel method with broad applicability is introduced to regularize out-of-sample structural equation modeling predictions, improving accuracy. The findings demonstrate that transcendent experiences, though diverse, might share a common underlying mechanism. Higher consciousness is identified primarily by a profound experience of unity-consciousness, with significant self-reported physical and psychological indications. The new higher consciousness scale lays the groundwork to study its predictors and understand its biological aspects.
Molina et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: