Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of 3 neonatal simulators in training medical students in resuscitation skills. Introduction: Simulation-based training is a critical component of neonatal resuscitation education. However, few studies have compared the educational value of different neonatal simulators. Methods: Sixty-eight fourth-year medical students participated in a Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation session using the Brayden Baby, Prestan Professional, and Baby Anne simulators. Following hands-on practice, students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating each simulator. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests. Results: Brayden Baby was significantly preferred in 7 out of 9 categories, including ease of positioning, ventilation, mask placement, and overall realism ( P < .05). Baby Anne was rated highest for realism in foreign body removal. Conclusion: Brayden Baby emerged as the most effective simulator, indicating its greater suitability for neonatal training. Careful simulator selection may enhance learning outcomes in neonatal resuscitation education.
Manjavidze et al. (Sat,) studied this question.