Abstract. Secondary ice production (SIP) can increase ice crystal number concentration (ICNC) by several orders of magnitude, particularly in clean clouds with low concentrations of ice-nucleating particles (INPs). The most common SIP process in models is rime splintering (RS) also called as the Hallett-Mossop process. The generally adopted RS-formulation gives 350 splinters per milligram of rimed ice at the temperature of 268 K. We used large-eddy simulations to examine if rime splintering could explain the high ICNC observed during the ACLOUD (Arctic CLoud Observations Using airborne measurements during polar Day) campaign where cloud temperatures close to 268 K are favourable for rime splintering. With the default model setup, the splinter production rate had to be multiplied by a factor ten to close the gap between modelled and observed ICNCs. Similar changes have been made in other modelling studies. The factor of ten multiplier helped to trigger SIP so that it became a self-sustaining process, fully independent of the primary freezing initiated by INPs. Our simulations reached realistic steady-state ICNCs and maintained stable mixed-phase clouds through the 24-hour simulation time. Additional sensitivity tests showed that the efficiency of SIP depends strongly on model parametrizations and air temperature, so that simulations with a modified setup were able to reproduce the observed ICNCs without the factor of ten multiplier.
Raatikainen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: