This study presents a case study of a holistic, psychosocial hazard management intervention program in a project-based, remote workforce in the Australian construction industry. There is a dearth of research on targeted, integrative, multi-level wellbeing interventions, and we seek to address this gap. Given the high rates of psychological distress and suicide in construction, understanding these hazards and the responses needed to manage them is critical for prevention. Data were collected from workers before and after the implementation of an intervention using an empirically validated measure of the work environment underpinned by the job demands–resources framework to evaluate exposure to psychosocial hazards, and mental health indicators, including psychological distress and suicidal ideation. Results revealed that job demands and resources improved following the change initiative, and workers reported significantly lower levels of psychological distress compared to workers on similarly diverse remote sites. The findings highlight the need for targeted mental health interventions addressing specific workplace psychosocial risks that adopt a holistic approach to change across all levels of an organisation. The study contributes to a nuanced understanding of psychosocial risks in construction and informs strategies to mitigate mental health harms in high-risk occupational settings.
Biggs et al. (Thu,) studied this question.