Abstract Purpose The functional composition and diversity of the gut microbiome may affect breast cancer risk by modulation of systemic sex hormones. Gut bacteria with β-glucuronidase enzymatic activity may deconjugate estrogens, leading to increased estrogen reabsorption into the circulation thereby increasing breast cancer risk. We investigated the relationship between the gut bacterial microbiome and endogenous estrogens and related sex hormones in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer compared to healthy control women. The goal was to determine if the estrobolome (i.e., bacteria capable of modulating the body’s circulated estrogen levels) was altered in those with breast cancer compared with controls. Methods In this prospective case–control study, postmenopausal women ( n = 46) with newly diagnosed stage I-III estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer were compared with healthy postmenopausal female controls ( n = 22). Bacterial composition of the gut microbiome was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing from fecal specimens. Plasma and urine sex hormones were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Results We found evidence that some β-glucuronidase positive bacteria were enriched in the breast cancer patients compared to healthy controls, whereas abundances of some β-glucuronidase negative bacteria were reduced. There was also a wide distribution of prevalence of β-glucuronidase positive taxa in both breast cancer subjects and healthy controls, as well as higher probability of breast cancer subjects having higher average β-glucuronidase levels. Significant differences were found in endogenous progesterone levels between the breast cancer patients and healthy controls. Conclusion This pilot study showed differences in the gut microbiome and endogenous progesterone levels among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer compared with healthy controls. These interesting findings may have implications for breast cancer risk and prevention and warrant further exploration.
Kwa et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: