Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The hydraulic performance of pooled stepped spillways has received less recognition compared to the traditional stepped spillways. Regarding the effectiveness of pooled stepped spillways in managing flow dynamics, previous studies have focused on investigating how different step configurations and varying chute angles can enhance energy dissipation in gravity flow over the chute. However, the potential for optimal performance and the importance of proper design have not been thoroughly explored in the existing literature. This study aims to explore new configurations of pooled stepped spillways and compare them to traditional stepped spillway designs to enhance hydraulic efficiency and maximize energy dissipation. The study examines two types of configurations of stepped spillways—two flat and two pooled configurations, each with ten steps. Using the computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) technique, such as Volume of Fluid Method (VOF) and the realizable k-ε turbulence model for two-phase flow analysis with a 26.6° chute slope. Initially, the model was validated with experimental data by comparing various hydraulic parameters. These parameters include water depth, roller length, jump length, ratio of critical depth, and sequent depth. The hydraulic performance of both stepped geometric configurations was evaluated through numerical simulations to examine how the geometries of flat and pooled stepped spillways influence flow characteristics, energy dissipation, velocity, pressure distribution, and the Froude number at the downstream. The study analyzed downstream flow characteristics, maximum energy dissipation rates, depth-averaged velocity, static pressure, and pressure contours at the lateral direction under six different flow rates in flat and pooled stepped spillways. The findings indicate that flat-step configurations exhibit lower energy dissipation compared to pooled configurations. The relative energy loss of flow on pooled steps dissipates more energy than on flat steps. Furthermore, it is observed that the pooled configurations performed better for energy dissipation and flow stability compared to the flat configurations. The energy dissipation increased in pooled stepped spillways by 34.68% and 25.81%, respectively. Additionally, the depth-averaged flow velocity and pressure distribution decreased in case 2 and case 4 compared to the flat-step configurations.
Farooq et al. (Fri,) studied this question.