Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In the article, based on a complex systematic methodological approach to the current legislation, the legal regulation of the assessment of the effectiveness of local executive authorities in the field of public order protection is considered. The study was built using general scientific methods of cognition. As one of the forms of public power, local executive power implements state policy on the ground, makes binding decisions on issues of local importance, ensures public order, and performs other governmental functions. Despite the difficulties of obtaining a quantitative assessment, associated with new trends in the development of economic and legal science and the approach to administrative-territorial formation as a socio-economic system, the need to evaluate the obtained results and control over management bodies is a management necessity. Assessment of the effectiveness of local executive bodies is one of the key factors in improving the quality of public administration at the local level. However, the content of the current legislative and by-law regulation demonstrates the imperfection of the standards that determine performance indicators from the point of view of them with the powers of the specified bodies. Existing performance indicators actually characterize the quality of work of local and central executive bodies. The improvement of the system of local executive power as an institution of public power is a necessary component of the general process of democratic transformations carried out today under martial law, and the creation of effective management tools as one of the fundamental foundations of statehood should be the logical conclusion of all work on reforming the power system. This presupposes the presence of effective and efficient structures at the local level, which acts as an element of the general system of public power, that is, as a public institution endowed with real authority. A conclusion is formulated on the expediency of improving the current rules, including the introduction of a new model that provides a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of central and local executive bodies operating in the relevant industry or sphere of management.
V.I. Stakhura (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: