Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The R744/R404A cascade refrigeration system (CRS) has been widely used in supermarkets and hypermarkets, but due to the refrigerant regulation of R404A, research on alternative refrigerants is necessary. In addition, although there have been quite a few studies on R448A and R449A, which are well-known alternatives to R404A, few studies have analyzed the performance coefficients of the three refrigerants, and the studies that have analyzed them are not based on enough variables. Therefore, we aimed to understand the performance characteristics of CRS combined with an internal heat exchanger (IHX) by applying R744 for the low-temperature cycle (LTC) and R404A, R448A, and R449A for the high-temperature cycle (HTC). The analysis method was to analyze the coefficient of performance (COP) and mass flow rate (MFR) of the three refrigerants according to the degree of subcooling (DSC) and degree of superheating (DSH), IHX efficiency, temperature difference in the cascade heat exchanger (CHX), condensation temperature (CT), evaporation temperature (ET), and cascade evaporation temperature (CET). The purpose of this study is to compare R448A and R449A, alternative refrigerants to R404A, in an R744/R404A CRS, with R404A to provide sufficient data for optimal CRS design. The comparison results are as follows: (1) Compared with R404A, the MFR of R448A and R449A are 67.27–77.6% and 70.05–80.80%, respectively, under the same conditions. Therefore, R448A and R449A are economically favorable because they have less refrigerant charge than R404A, and R448A is more favorable than R449A. (2) The R744/R448A CRS is stable and performs better than the R744/R449A CRS in places with large changes in the surrounding environment.
Jeon et al. (Fri,) studied this question.