Against the backdrop of rapid development in modern medical technology and profound changes in social values, the legal positioning and governance model of reproductive rights face unprecedented challenges and opportunities. The continuous emergence of reproductive rights dispute cases in judicial practice has exposed the theoretical deficiencies and institutional gaps in the current legal system regarding the definition of rights nature. As an important component of the modern human rights framework, the legal nature of reproductive rights should be clearly classified as personality rights rather than traditional status rights. The revolutionary progress of assisted reproductive technology has not only expanded the technical pathways for realizing reproductive rights but also triggered deep value conflicts between individual choice and social norms, immediate needs and long-term considerations. Through systematic analysis of the legal attributes of reproductive rights, in-depth study of value contradictions in the regulatory process, and proposing innovative legal governance solutions, this paper provides theoretical support and practical guidance for constructing a modernized reproductive rights protection system.
She Yuyang (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: