Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The rapid evolution of Android platforms and user expectations necessitates continual enhancement and migration of key features within Android applications. This paper explores various architectural approaches to effectively migrate essential functionalities in Android apps, ensuring scalability, maintainability, and optimal user experience. Initially, the study delineates the challenges inherent in feature migration, including compatibility issues, performance constraints, and the preservation of existing user interfaces. It then examines prominent architectural paradigms such as Model-View-View Model (MVVM), Clean Architecture, and modular architectures, evaluating their suitability for facilitating seamless feature transitions. The research further investigates the role of microservices and component-based designs in enabling incremental migration, allowing developers to update or replace specific modules without overhauling the entire application. Additionally, the paper discusses best practices for managing dependencies, ensuring backward compatibility, and employing automated testing to mitigate risks during the migration process. Case studies of successful Android app migrations are presented to illustrate the practical application of these architectural strategies. The findings highlight that adopting a modular and flexible architectural framework significantly enhances the ability to migrate key features efficiently while minimizing disruptions. Moreover, the integration of robust architectural patterns fosters better code maintainability and accelerates the development cycle for future updates. In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive guide for Android developers aiming to navigate the complexities of feature migration, advocating for architectural approaches that balance innovation with stability. The insights garnered offer valuable implications for the design and evolution of resilient Android applications in a dynamic technological landscape.
Joshi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.