Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Recently created long-term and regionally dispersed satellite-based rainfall estimates have emerged as crucial sources of rainfall data to assess rainfalls spatial and temporal variability, particularly for data-scarce locations. iObjective (the general)/i: The purpose of this paper is to assess the skills of nine selected satellite rainfall estimates i.e., (ARC 2.0, TRMM 3B42, CHIRPS v. 2.0, TAMSAT 3.1, CMORPH v. 1.0 adj., PERSIANN CDR and DNRT, and MSWEP v. 2.2) and understand Spatio-temporal variability of rainfall over the Omo River basin using the best performing product. iMethod/i: The validation analysis was done by using a point-to-grid-based comparison test at different temporal accumulations. MSWEP was selected as the best product to analyze the long-term trend and variability of rainfall over the Omo-River basin from 1990-2017. The coefficients of variation (CV) and the standardization rainfall anomalies index (SRAI) were used to examine rainfall variability, while the Mann-Kendall (MK) and Sen slope estimators were used to examine the trend and magnitude of rainfall patterns. iResults/i: The overall statistical, categorical, and volumetric validation index results show that the MSWEP is the best performing rainfall product followed by CHRIPS, 3B42, and TAMSAT according to their order of appearance than the remaining products (i.e., ARC, RFE, PER CDR, PER DNRT, and CMORPH). The CV result with the relatively highest monthly variability (CV 30%) was observed in some southern, northern, southeastern, and central parts of the study area. In general, the overall annual CV shows almost no variation in the entire basin except in the lower part because of the regions prevalent topographic variances, which ranged from 3455 to 352 m.a.s.l. In addition, the highest seasonal positive and negative anomalies are observed in each season in the entire basin. These abnormalities can result in significant floods and droughts that unquestionably influence the basin and its resources. iConclusion/i: In general, the basin has an increasing trend in the southern portions and a declining trend in the central to northern tip parts of the basin, as can be observed from the annual average MK trend tests. The basin has experienced a greeter variation but is not significant except in some parts of the basin.
Asefw et al. (Sat,) studied this question.