examines Emily Jones' Feminist Theory and International Law: Posthuman Perspectives, which develops "posthuman feminism" to diagnose the exclusionary humanism and anthropocentrism of international law.It unpacks key elements of Jones' approach, her critique of international law's foundations, and her attempt to move "beyond liberal legalism."While tensions arise between Jones' theoretical framework and reform proposals, her insistent bridging of theory and practice demonstrates posthuman feminism's potential for inspiring creative re-imaginings of legal praxis.
Shisong Jiang (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: