Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
. This paper presents a new accelerated proximal Markov chain Monte Carlo methodology to perform Bayesian inference in imaging inverse problems with an underlying convex geometry. The proposed strategy takes the form of a stochastic relaxed proximal-point iteration that admits two complementary interpretations. For models that are smooth or regularized by Moreau–Yosida smoothing, the algorithm is equivalent to an implicit midpoint discretization of an overdamped Langevin diffusion targeting the posterior distribution of interest. This discretization is asymptotically unbiased for Gaussian targets and shown to converge in an accelerated manner for any target that is \ (\) -strongly log-concave (i. e. , requiring in the order of \ (\) iterations to converge, similar to accelerated optimization schemes), comparing favorably to Pereyra, Vargas Mieles, and Zygalakis SIAM J. Imaging Sci. , 13 (2020), pp. 905–935, which is only provably accelerated for Gaussian targets and has bias. For models that are not smooth, the algorithm is equivalent to a Leimkuhler–Matthews discretization of a Langevin diffusion targeting a Moreau–Yosida approximation of the posterior distribution of interest and hence achieves a significantly lower bias than conventional unadjusted Langevin strategies based on the Euler–Maruyama discretization. For targets that are \ (\) -strongly log-concave, the provided nonasymptotic convergence analysis also identifies the optimal time step, which maximizes the convergence speed. The proposed methodology is demonstrated through a range of experiments related to image deconvolution with Gaussian and Poisson noise with assumption-driven and data-driven convex priors. Source codes for the numerical experiments of this paper are available from https: //github. com/MI2G/accelerated-langevin-imla. Keywordsuncertainty quantificationBayesian imagingMarkov chain Monte Carlo methodsinverse problemsproximal algorithmsdeblurringMSC codes65C4068U1062F1565C6065J2268W25
Klatzer et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: