Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze ethnic conflict resolution in post-conflict societies in Bosnia. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Studies on ethnic conflict resolution in post-conflict Bosnia emphasize intergroup dialogue, economic development, and transitional justice. Contact initiatives foster trust, while economic empowerment reduces tensions. Truth and reconciliation processes acknowledge past wrongs, and diaspora involvement aids peacebuilding. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Identity theory, contact theory & structural violence theory may be used to anchor future studies on ethnic conflict resolution in post-conflict societies in Bosnia. Practitioners should prioritize initiatives that promote interethnic dialogue, reconciliation, and community engagement at the grassroots level. Policymakers must prioritize inclusive governance structures that ensure the meaningful participation of all ethnic groups in decision-making processes.
Ajla Begić (Sat,) studied this question.