Pd36-12 Artificial Intelligence as a Time-Efficient and Quality Tool for Contouring in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics

You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology for the AI and radiologist contours (AI-R), the values were 0.757, 0.614, 17.562 mm, and 3.050 mm for the prostate, 0.451, 0.315 16.069 mm, and 4.075 mm for the seminal vesicle, and 0.162, 0.092, 19.956 mm, and 4.798 mm for the urethra. In comparing the contours of the urologist to the radiologist (U-R), the values of the prostate were 0.769, 0.630, 15.109 mm, and 2.733 mm, for the seminal vesicle, 0.471, 0.333, 12.981 mm, 3.264 mm, and for the urethra, 0.144, 0.080, 13.560 mm, and 3.406 mm. For the prostate and urethra, the AI-U comparison differed from the other comparisons (p0.05). The average times to produce contours for the AI, urologist, and radiologist were 96.5 seconds, 285.8 seconds, and 217.9 seconds, respectively (p<0.05 for each time). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, for the seminal vesicle, no statistical difference between the Dice similarities of AI-U, AI-R, and U-R was observed. For the prostate and urethra, while AI-U had a higher conformity than AI-R and U-R, which presented similar conformities, it is unlikely the lower conformity is linked to the AI's accuracy. Hence, AI varies in conformity as much as any other physician and generates contours in less time. Overall, current AI software holds potential as an effort-reducing tool for streamlining prostate cancer diagnostics in the clinical setting. Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e797 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Puranjay Shori More articles by this author Jong H. Kim More articles by this author Robert I. Carey More articles by this author Victoria Y. Bird More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...