Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper will examine the case study of Tel Burnat, located to the north of Nablus in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, to demonstrate how the concept of backdirt may be employed to deconstruct the interrelation between academic archaeological discourse and public archaeological discourse in the neoliberal era. Building upon the reconfiguration of the concept of backdirt by Carvalho (this issue) and Rivera Prince and Morales (this issue), it is my claim that backdirt serves as a subversive component in archaeological procedure. As such, it invites a critical examination of how different components of archaeological procedure attribute different degrees of importance to the same archaeological findings.
Chemi Shiff (Mon,) studied this question.