The article presents a comprehensive study of the phenomenon of digital identity in the context of contemporary challenges to the protection and safeguarding of human rights under conditions of global digital transformation and the rapid development of virtual environments. It is emphasized that the growing scale of the collection and processing of personal and confidential data, the increasing reliance on algorithmic decision-making systems, and the gradual displacement of direct human involvement in identification and control processes highlight the need to reconsider conceptual, legal, and ethical approaches to the regulation of digital identity. It is established that the right to identity still lacks unified recognition in international legal instruments, resulting in multiple doctrinal approaches—ranging from its understanding as an autonomous subjective right to its definition as a tool for accessing other rights or even as a potential threat to their realization. The evolution of digital identity is traced from basic authentication mechanisms to multi-layered structures integrating personal characteristics, behavioral patterns, biometric data, and users’ digital footprints. Key risks are identified, including discrimination, social exclusion of vulnerable groups, unjustified profiling, excessive surveillance, misuse of data, and the potential use of identification systems as tools of political or social pressure. The positions of international institutions on the conceptualization of digital identity and its relationship with human rights are analyzed. Promising technological solutions for balancing security and privacy are proposed, including decentralized blockchain-based identification with integrated smart contracts, zero-knowledge proof protocols, biometric verification, and verified account labeling. It is argued that the optimal model of digital identification in virtual environments should combine technological reliability, flexibility, ethical soundness, and compliance with international standards, ensuring a balance between the right to privacy, effective authentication, and the preservation of user trust in digital infrastructure.
O. I. Chepis (Thu,) studied this question.