Abstract This article introduces the concept of ‘eco-humanitarian rentierism’ to explain how states facing intersecting crises of climate change and forced displacement strategically mobilize crisis narratives to extract external resources. Building on theories of rentierism, migration diplomacy and environmental politics, it argues that states convert ecological and humanitarian risk into geopolitical, economic and symbolic capital by aligning with donor priorities and performing responsibility within fragmented global governance regimes. Through a comparative analysis of Egypt and Jordan, the article draws on policy documents, official speeches and donor agreements to trace how governments construct and operationalize crisis narratives that attract finance and international recognition. These rent-seeking practices rely on crisis narration, discursive alignment and performative compliance, and are rewarded within institutional architectures marked by asymmetry, fragmentation and donor discretion. While these strategies generate short-term gains in funding, visibility and diplomatic leverage, they risk reinforcing dependency, marginalizing affected populations and displacing longer-term redistributive reform. The analysis advances International Relations debates on agency under constraint, the strategic behaviours of weaker states and the reproduction of global hierarchies through the political economy of aid. By bringing together debates on environmental politics, migration governance and the international political economy of crisis, the article offers an original framework for understanding how global South states navigate and reproduce structural hierarchies in the international system. It highlights the political and ethical stakes of converting crisis into capital, and calls for more integrated, participatory and equitable approaches to global crisis governance that prioritize long-term resilience over transactional management.
Tsourapas et al. (Mon,) studied this question.